Search for: All records

Coastal salt marshes store large amounts of carbon but the magnitude and patterns of greenhouse gas (GHG; i.e., carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH4</sub>)) fluxes are unclear. Information about GHG fluxes from these ecosystems comes from studies of sediments or at the ecosystem-scale (eddy covariance) but fluxes from tidal creeks are unknown. </div>This dataset includes GHG concentrations in water, water quality, meteorology, sediment CO2</sub> efflux, ecosystem-scale GHG fluxes, and plant phenology; all at half-hour time-steps over one year.</div></div>This study was carried out in the St. Jones Reserve, a component of the Delaware National Estuarine Research Reserve in Dover, Delaware, U.S.A. The study site is part of the following networks:</div></div>- AmeriFlux (https://ameriflux.lbl.gov/sites/siteinfo/US-StJ) </div>- Phenocam (https://phenocam.sr.unh.edu/webcam/sites/stjones/) </div></div>The GHG concentration and efflux sampling point was located at Aspen Landing within a microtidal (mean tide range of 1.5 m), mesohaline (typical salinity of 5-18 ppt) salt marsh (Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, 2006) tidal creek.</div></div>Main reference:</div> Trifunovic, B., Vázquez‐Lule, A., Capooci, M., Seyfferth, A. L., Moffat, C., & Vargas, R. (2020). Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from a temperate salt marsh tidal creek. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 125, e2019JG005558. https://doi.org/ 10.1029/2019JG005558 </p> </div> </div> </div></div></sub> 

Abstract Coastal salt marshes store large amounts of carbon but the magnitude and patterns of greenhouse gas (GHG; i.e., carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄)) fluxes are unclear. Information about GHG fluxes from these ecosystems comes from studies of sediments or at the ecosystem‐scale (eddy covariance) but fluxes from tidal creeks are unknown. We measured GHG concentrations in water, water quality, meteorological parameters, sediment CO₂efflux, ecosystem‐scale GHG fluxes, and plant phenology; all at half‐hour intervals over 1 year. Manual creek GHG flux measurements were used to calculate gas transfer velocity (k) and parameterize a model of water‐to‐atmosphere GHG fluxes. The creek was a source of GHGs to the atmosphere where tidal patterns controlled diel variability. Dissolved oxygen and wind speed were negatively correlated with creek CH₄efflux. Despite lacking a seasonal pattern, creek CO₂efflux was correlated with drivers such as turbidity across phenological phases. Overall, nighttime creek CO₂efflux (3.6 ± 0.63 μmol/m²/s) was at least 2 times higher than nighttime marsh sediment CO₂efflux (1.5 ± 1.23 μmol/m²/s). Creek CH₄efflux (17.5 ± 6.9 nmol/m²/s) was 4 times lower than ecosystem‐scale CH₄fluxes (68.1 ± 52.3 nmol/m²/s) across the year. These results suggest that tidal creeks are potential hotspots for CO₂emissions and could contribute to lateral transport of CH₄to the coastal ocean due to supersaturation of CH₄(>6,000 μmol/mol) in water. This study provides insights for modeling GHG efflux from tidal creeks and suggests that changes in tide stage overshadow water temperature in determining magnitudes of fluxes.